🔊
2022-07-15
The hosts open with a lighter discussion of John Fetterman’s trolling-style campaign tactics, then pivot to major political news that Donald Trump is signaling an imminent 2024 announcement and what that could mean for media attention and potential legal jeopardy. Most of the episode focuses on the January 6 committee hearings, emphasizing evidence that the Capitol attack was planned as part of a broader, step-by-step effort driven by Trump rather than a protest that “got out of hand.” They unpack standout testimony and messages from Trump-world figures, the chaotic internal White House dynamics (including the Sidney Powell/Flynn meeting), and the moral failings of “adults in the room” who didn’t resign or fully cooperate, with particular scrutiny of Mike Pence and Pat Cipollone. The conversation also touches on Oath Keepers testimony, the Secret Service’s missing texts, the delayed National Guard response, and how accountability has largely fallen on foot soldiers rather than leaders, before closing with cautious optimism that extremist GOP candidates could reshape the midterm environment if Democrats effectively frame the choice.
🌐
2022-04-11
Using the Tower of Babel as a metaphor, the article argues that America’s rapid social and institutional fragmentation in the 2010s mirrors a sudden collapse of shared language and truth, not only between left and right but within factions, organizations, and families. It contrasts earlier techno-optimism about the internet and early social media as forces for large-scale cooperation with the post-2012 reality that platforms reshaped how information spreads and how institutions function. The author contends that healthy democracies depend on social capital, strong institutions, and shared narratives, and that social media has eroded all three. This shift is traced to design changes around 2009–2012—likes, retweets, shares, and engagement-driven algorithms—that intensified virality and rewarded emotionally provocative content, especially outrage at perceived out-groups. The resulting incentives foster performative behavior, dishonesty, and mob dynamics, leaving people more connected technologically but less able to understand one another.
1